By Rabbi Shloimie Lindenbaum
ועשה הכהן אחד לחטאת…מאשר חטא על הנפש (פרק ו פסוק יא)
When a person decides to be a נזיר they are not allowed to drink wine, cut their hair, or become impure
by coming into contact with a dead person. If there is an uncontrollable situation in which they become
impure then they must bring a sin-offering because of their sin. Rashi quotes an opinion that the sin that
the sacrifice is atoning for is “ציער עצמו מן היין”- he pained himself [by restraining] from wine. The Kli
Yakar asks, if that is the sin, then why only bring an offering after becoming impure? Every נזיר commits
this crime? He answers that the sin is not merely that the נזיר didn’t drink wine, rather that he pained
himself in the process. Once he was serving Hashem in this way of abstinence he should have done it
happily. Had he been happy and satisfied with his way of life as a נזיר, he certainly would have been
more careful and not allowed himself to become impure. Therefore, only after becoming impure do we
see that he wasn’t observing his נזירות with total happiness and excitement and his paining himself is
considered sinful. Only now he must bring a sin offering for not serving Hashem with joy.
פר אחד בן בקר איל אחד כבש אחד בן שנתו לעולה (פרק ז פסוק כא)
The Torah describes at length how the נשיא of every שבט brought קרבנות as a way of initiating the משכן.
They each brought one bull, one ram, and one lamb. Rashi explains that the bull corresponds to
Avraham who slaughtered a calf in serving the angels who came to his tent and the ram represents
Yitzchak who had a ram brought in his place by the עקידה. Yaakov is signified by the lamb because he
separated lambs when serving Lavan and tending to his flocks. The bull and ram are understandable,
because Avraham’s serving guests with a calf was the prime example of his מדת החסד which was his
overriding מדה, and Yitzchak’s willingness to sacrifice himself was a monumental moment in our history.
The lamb, however, is strange- why is Yaakov signified by his service to Lavan as a shepherd? R’ Elya
Boruch Finkel says that we see from here that Yaakov attained his ultimate level as a צדיק by being
honest with Lavan’s money. Although he had opportunities to justify crooked behavior, he did not veer
from the path of absolute truth. This מדה brought him to his perfection, as is implied by the רמב"ם who
only refers to Yaakov as Yaakov the צדיק in reference to his serving Lavan honestly. This is why the
נשיאים brought lambs to signify Yaakov at his highest level.
